22 мая 2020, 22:58 — incident24.com
I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 since the main-stream news have actually guaranteed really people that are few the information associated with the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought to never have already been arrested in britain to start with while there is no instance, with no investigation that is genuine. Check this out and also you will understand why.
One other thing perhaps perhaps not commonly grasped can there be isn't any JURY in a rape test in Sweden which is a SECRET TRIAL. Every one of the proof, most of the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. The actual only real public component is the charging and also the verdict. There was a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by political parties. Which means you never ever would get to comprehend exactly exactly just how clearly the full situation is really a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You can find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps away I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:
Why did Anna Ardin maybe not warn Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with free sex cam Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood when you look at the group that is swedish Assange for the shocking red cashmere sweater she had worn right in front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange ended up being about to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a buddy who had been in search of Assange:
“He’s not right right right here. He’s planned to own intercourse utilizing the cashmere woman every night, yet not managed to make it. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that just three days early in the day, on 13 August, she was in fact intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault so serious she ended up being ready to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s life that is entire. She ended up being additionally to mention that this attack included enforced sex that is unprotected she ended up being concerned with HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And just why ended up being Ardin talking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about this to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information and even had organised her enrollment for the press seminar. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don't we fit that into an extremely brief survey associated with the whole Ardin/Assange relationship.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press meeting organised by a branch associated with the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she's going to be away.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She's got supper with Assange plus they have actually consensual intercourse, regarding the day that is first of. Ardin afterwards alleges this converted into attack by surreptitious mutilation regarding the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him in the dais at his press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a crayfish party, anyone have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This make an effort to locate a crayfish party fails, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from bed early that early early morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless in the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting in the open air at 02:00 and barely freezing using the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, relating to both their authorities testimonies, sleep once more in identical solitary sleep, and continue doing therefore for the next day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have sexual intercourse; Anna tells police they cannot. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep within the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not alert her of possible intimate attack. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once more declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is concerned about STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague for a passing fancy ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply simply take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration accusing Assange of rape. Wilen does not want to signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities statement alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged interview with Krans – and Wilen came ahead not to ever grumble of an attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration rape that is alleging that was drafted by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is simple any particular one of a couple of things took place:
Ardin ended up being intimately assaulted with non-safe sex, but neglected to alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general public and personal with him, behave as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to support him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” returned home early after providing him the utilization of her one sleep flat while she ended up being away. By her very own admission, she had consensual intercourse with him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist buddy, policewoman Irmeli Krans, to be able to twist Wilen’s tale into a sexual assault – really easy given Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape rules. Wilen declined to signal.
During the authorities place on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did not need to place any costs against JA nevertheless the authorities wished to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The next evening at 22.22 she texted “it had been law enforcement whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then made her story that is own of attack. As numerous friends knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could maybe perhaps not claim non-consensual intercourse. Therefore she manufactured her tale to squeeze in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event associated with condom that is torn. Nevertheless the condom that is torn produced doesn't have trace of Assange upon it. Its impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.
I have no trouble in stating that We securely think Ardin to become a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which can be, when you look at the literal feeling, amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn't matter. Firstly, you had been never designed to see all of this detail. Rape studies in Sweden are held totally in key. There isn't any jury, in addition to federal federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed directly by governmental events. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.
Next, needless to say, no matter the data is indeed poor, as merely to cry rape is always to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying a lot of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The important points for the whole tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically correct viewpoint falls in behind the line that it's wrong also to check out evidence. If you should be maybe not allowed to understand whom the accuser is, how could you discover that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro teams in Havana and Miami?
Finally, to those of good use idiots whom declare that the best way to test these matters is with in court, I would personally state needless to say, you're appropriate, we must trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, so we should positively condemn the behaviour that is disgraceful of whom campaigned when it comes to Birmingham Six.